GURMEJ SINGH ALIAS GEJU vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/583/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21/60. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010057382026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/2712/2026

Filing Date

09-04-2026

Registration No

BA1/583/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21/60

Petitioner(s)

GURMEJ SINGH ALIAS GEJU

Adv. SARITA BISHT,PIYUSH SAMMAL,PIYUSH SAMMAL, ,PIYUSH SAMMAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

15-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

15-05-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

30-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

15-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
15-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
11-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
15-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Gurmej Singh (alias Geju) in a NDPS case, finding that no independent public witness was associated during the alleged search and seizure at a public place, and that mandatory provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act were not complied with. The applicant was ordered released on personal bond and two sureties without prejudice to the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Gurmej Singh (alias Geju) in a NDPS case, finding that no independent public witness was associated during the alleged search and seizure at a public place, and that mandatory provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act were not complied with. The applicant was ordered released on personal bond and two sureties without prejudice to the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case