RAJESH SINGH BISHT vs VIKRAM SINGH LATWAL Advocate - SIDDHARTHA SINGH, DEVENDRA SINGH NEGI (FOR CAVEATOR) — SA/37/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jul-2026

CNR: UKHC010057342026

Filing Number

SA/3025/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

SA/37/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH SINGH BISHT

    Adv. NAVNISH NEGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAM SINGH LATWAL Advocate - SIDDHARTHA SINGH, DEVENDRA SINGH NEGI (FOR CAVEATOR)

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jul-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    Case Summary: SA/37/2026 Outcome: Second appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 10.07.2026 with status quo maintained on property possession. Details: Rajesh Singh Bisht's second appeal challenges the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's judgment that had allowed his counter-claim for possession recovery of property (Khasra No.506/1). The court admitted the appeal based on questions regarding admissibility of a 1998 agreement-to-sell under Registration Act provisions and its use in defending possession claims. Trial court record summoned; parties ordered to maintain possession status quo pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA/37/2026 Outcome: Second appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 10.07.2026 with status quo maintained on property possession. Details: Rajesh Singh Bisht's second appeal challenges the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's judgment that had allowed his counter-claim for possession recovery of property (Khasra No.506/1). The court admitted the appeal based on questions regarding admissibility of a 1998 agreement-to-sell under Registration Act provisions and its use in defending possession claims. Trial court record summoned; parties ordered to maintain possession status quo pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case