RAJESH SINGH BISHT vs VIKRAM SINGH LATWAL Advocate - SIDDHARTHA SINGH, DEVENDRA SINGH NEGI (FOR CAVEATOR) — SA/37/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010057342026
Next Hearing
10th July 2026
Filing Number
SA/3025/2026
Filing Date
09-04-2026
Registration No
SA/37/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESH SINGH BISHT
Adv. NAVNISH NEGI
Respondent(s)
VIKRAM SINGH LATWAL Advocate - SIDDHARTHA SINGH, DEVENDRA SINGH NEGI (FOR CAVEATOR)
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 10-07-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: SA/37/2026 Outcome: Second appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 10.07.2026 with status quo maintained on property possession. Details: Rajesh Singh Bisht's second appeal challenges the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's judgment that had allowed his counter-claim for possession recovery of property (Khasra No.506/1). The court admitted the appeal based on questions regarding admissibility of a 1998 agreement-to-sell under Registration Act provisions and its use in defending possession claims. Trial court record summoned; parties ordered to maintain possession status quo pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SA/37/2026 Outcome: Second appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 10.07.2026 with status quo maintained on property possession. Details: Rajesh Singh Bisht's second appeal challenges the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's judgment that had allowed his counter-claim for possession recovery of property (Khasra No.506/1). The court admitted the appeal based on questions regarding admissibility of a 1998 agreement-to-sell under Registration Act provisions and its use in defending possession claims. Trial court record summoned; parties ordered to maintain possession status quo pending next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts