RAJESH SINGH BISHT vs VIKRAM SINGH LATWAL Advocate - SIDDHARTHA SINGH, DEVENDRA SINGH NEGI (FOR CAVEATOR) — SA/38/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

CNR: UKHC010057292026

Next Hearing

10th July 2026

Filing Number

SA/3023/2026

Filing Date

09-04-2026

Registration No

SA/38/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

RAJESH SINGH BISHT

Adv. NAVNISH NEGI

Respondent(s)

VIKRAM SINGH LATWAL Advocate - SIDDHARTHA SINGH, DEVENDRA SINGH NEGI (FOR CAVEATOR)

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

16-04-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

10-07-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

08-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Case Summary: SA/38/2026 Outcome: Second Appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 10.07.2026 for further consideration. Parties directed to maintain status quo regarding property possession (Khasra No.506/1) until next hearing. Trial court record summoned. Key Issue: Whether the First Appellate Court erred in granting an injunction decree favoring Rajesh Singh Bisht when the plaintiff failed to properly identify the suit property in his title deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA/38/2026 Outcome: Second Appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 10.07.2026 for further consideration. Parties directed to maintain status quo regarding property possession (Khasra No.506/1) until next hearing. Trial court record summoned. Key Issue: Whether the First Appellate Court erred in granting an injunction decree favoring Rajesh Singh Bisht when the plaintiff failed to properly identify the suit property in his title deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case