RAJESH SINGH BISHT vs VIKRAM SINGH LATWAL Advocate - SIDDHARTHA SINGH, DEVENDRA SINGH NEGI (FOR CAVEATOR) — SA/38/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010057292026
Filing Number
SA/3023/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
SA/38/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH SINGH BISHT
Adv. NAVNISH NEGI
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIKRAM SINGH LATWAL Advocate - SIDDHARTHA SINGH, DEVENDRA SINGH NEGI (FOR CAVEATOR)
Case History
-
10-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jul-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF
Case Summary: SA/38/2026 Outcome: Second Appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 10.07.2026 for further consideration. Parties directed to maintain status quo regarding property possession (Khasra No.506/1) until next hearing. Trial court record summoned. Key Issue: Whether the First Appellate Court erred in granting an injunction decree favoring Rajesh Singh Bisht when the plaintiff failed to properly identify the suit property in his title deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. SA/38/2026
Case Summary: SA/38/2026 Outcome: Second Appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 10.07.2026 for further consideration. Parties directed to maintain status quo regarding property possession (Khasra No.506/1) until next hearing. Trial court record summoned. Key Issue: Whether the First Appellate Court erred in granting an injunction decree favoring Rajesh Singh Bisht when the plaintiff failed to properly identify the suit property in his title deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts