DIVYA PANDEY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — SPA/100/2026
Case under Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section VIII. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010057192026
Filing Number
SPA/3019/2026
Filing Date
09-04-2026
Registration No
SPA/100/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIVYA PANDEY
Adv. GYANENDRA KUMAR SHARMA,KHUSHBOO TIWARI SHARMA,KHUSHBOO TIWARI SHARMA, ,PRATEEK TRIPATHI,KHUSHBOO TIWARI SHARMA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
ZILLA PANCHAYAT
Adv. N S PUNDIR
SHRI RAJIV KUMAR NATH TRIPATHI
SHRI GANESH KUMAR BHATT
SHRI YASHWANT SINGH FARSWASHN
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 16-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed Divya Pandey's appeal and granted interim protection against dispossession from her 30-year lease property with Zila Panchayat, Dehradun, which was cancelled by the state on 25.03.2026. The court directed that the appellant shall not be dispossessed until the Single Judge decides the interim stay application, while warning that any adjournment requests may result in an ex parte decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed Divya Pandey's appeal and granted interim protection against dispossession from her 30-year lease property with Zila Panchayat, Dehradun, which was cancelled by the state on 25.03.2026. The court directed that the appellant shall not be dispossessed until the Single Judge decides the interim stay application, while warning that any adjournment requests may result in an ex parte decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts