LAKHWINDER SINGH ALIAS LUCKY vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/664/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 363,366A,376. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010056492026

Filing Number

C528/2659/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

C528/664/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 363,366A,376
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 5/6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKHWINDER SINGH ALIAS LUCKY

    Adv. GEETANJALI DHAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.KANHIYA SINGH

    Adv. TANUJA JOSHI

  3. 3.PAYAL

    Adv. TANUJA JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF

    The court allowed the compounding application and quashed the entire POCSO criminal proceedings against the applicant. The court found that the parties had amicably settled their dispute, the victim (now married to the applicant since June 2024) confirmed no physical relations occurred before marriage and did not wish to pursue prosecution, and Supreme Court precedent permits compounding of non-compoundable offences when conviction likelihood is remote and continuation would cause injustice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/664/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the compounding application and quashed the entire POCSO criminal proceedings against the applicant. The court found that the parties had amicably settled their dispute, the victim (now married to the applicant since June 2024) confirmed no physical relations occurred before marriage and did not wish to pursue prosecution, and Supreme Court precedent permits compounding of non-compoundable offences when conviction likelihood is remote and continuation would cause injustice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case