NAVAL RAJ ALIAS RAJORIA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLR/250/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B,420,467,468,471. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010056332026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLR/2646/2026
Filing Date
08-04-2026
Registration No
CRLR/250/2026
Registration Date
08-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISIONS ( 4 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAVAL RAJ ALIAS RAJORIA
Adv. SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
DEVKI DEVI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 04-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 02-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 23-04-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 23-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary: Four criminal revision petitions (CRLR Nos. 246, 250, 256, and 258 of 2026) were admitted by the court. The revisionists, who were convicted and sentenced to seven years imprisonment with fine by the trial court (confirmed by appellate court), sought exemption from surrender based on a settlement reached between parties. The court allowed all exemption applications after noting that the parties had entered into a compromise, and dismissed the bail applications as not pressed. The revisions were listed for hearing in the week commencing 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Four criminal revision petitions (CRLR Nos. 246, 250, 256, and 258 of 2026) were admitted by the court. The revisionists, who were convicted and sentenced to seven years imprisonment with fine by the trial court (confirmed by appellate court), sought exemption from surrender based on a settlement reached between parties. The court allowed all exemption applications after noting that the parties had entered into a compromise, and dismissed the bail applications as not pressed. The revisions were listed for hearing in the week commencing 06.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts