NAUSHAD vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE — WPMS/908/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010056302026

Filing Number

WPMS/2985/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPMS/908/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAUSHAD

    Adv. MOHD SAFDAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

  2. 2.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE ROORKEE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.TAHSILDAR ROORKEE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.VIJENDRA SINGH

  5. 5.BHANDWAR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Naushad against the District Magistrate and other Roorkee officials as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh petition. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition contained glaring mistakes uncorrectable by amendment. A cost of ₹2,000 was imposed, payable to the Uttarakhand High Court Bar Association Advocate Welfare Fund within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/908/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Naushad against the District Magistrate and other Roorkee officials as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh petition. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the petition contained glaring mistakes uncorrectable by amendment. A cost of ₹2,000 was imposed, payable to the Uttarakhand High Court Bar Association Advocate Welfare Fund within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case