DEEN MOHAMMAD ALIAS DINNA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C447/17/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376(2)(N),376(3),504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 02nd May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010056252026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C447/2642/2026

Filing Date

08-04-2026

Registration No

C447/17/2026

Registration Date

08-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

HARIDWAR ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376(2)(N),376(3),504,506
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 3(A)/4(2),5(I)(J)(2)/6

Petitioner(s)

DEEN MOHAMMAD ALIAS DINNA

Adv. MOHD UMAR,IRAM,IRAM, ,Sajjad Ahmad,IRAM

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

10-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

02-05-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

20-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

10-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
20-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
02-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

The court allowed the applicant's transfer application and transferred Special Sessions Trial No.127 of 2024 from the POCSO court in Roorkee to a competent court at Haridwar. The court found that despite DNA testing conclusively proving the applicant is not the biological father of the child born to the rape victim, the trial court and investigating officer continued harassing him by repeatedly summoning him to disclose the biological father's identity, constituting unwarranted harassment, bias, and abuse of process that warranted transfer to maintain judicial propriety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the applicant's transfer application and transferred Special Sessions Trial No.127 of 2024 from the POCSO court in Roorkee to a competent court at Haridwar. The court found that despite DNA testing conclusively proving the applicant is not the biological father of the child born to the rape victim, the trial court and investigating officer continued harassing him by repeatedly summoning him to disclose the biological father's identity, constituting unwarranted harassment, bias, and abuse of process that warranted transfer to maintain judicial propriety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case