DEEN MOHAMMAD ALIAS DINNA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C447/17/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376(2)(N),376(3),504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 02nd May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010056252026
Filing Number
C447/2642/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
C447/17/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
HARIDWAR ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEN MOHAMMAD ALIAS DINNA
Adv. MOHD UMAR,IRAM,IRAM, ,Sajjad Ahmad,IRAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
The court allowed the applicant's transfer application and transferred Special Sessions Trial No.127 of 2024 from the POCSO court in Roorkee to a competent court at Haridwar. The court found that despite DNA testing conclusively proving the applicant is not the biological father of the child born to the rape victim, the trial court and investigating officer continued harassing him by repeatedly summoning him to disclose the biological father's identity, constituting unwarranted harassment, bias, and abuse of process that warranted transfer to maintain judicial propriety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C447/17/2026
The court allowed the applicant's transfer application and transferred Special Sessions Trial No.127 of 2024 from the POCSO court in Roorkee to a competent court at Haridwar. The court found that despite DNA testing conclusively proving the applicant is not the biological father of the child born to the rape victim, the trial court and investigating officer continued harassing him by repeatedly summoning him to disclose the biological father's identity, constituting unwarranted harassment, bias, and abuse of process that warranted transfer to maintain judicial propriety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts