ISHPAL SINGH vs DILIP JAWALKAR — CLCON/169/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: --DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 28th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010056182026
Filing Number
CLCON/2979/2026
Filing Date
08-04-2026
Registration No
CLCON/169/2026
Registration Date
08-04-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ISHPAL SINGH
Adv. ASHISH JOSHI,SHOBHIT JOSHI,SHOBHIT JOSHI, ,SHOBHIT JOSHI
Respondent(s)
DILIP JAWALKAR
SHRI YUGAL KISHOR PANT
SHRI SHUBASH CHANDRA
SMT AMITA JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 28-04-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 27-04-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
Summary: The court dismissed nine consolidated contempt petitions (CLCON Nos. 160-169 of 2026) as infructuous after both the petitioners and the State agreed that the original order had already been fully complied with by the respondents. Since the subject matter of the contempt complaints had been resolved through compliance, the court found no surviving issue requiring adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dismissed nine consolidated contempt petitions (CLCON Nos. 160-169 of 2026) as infructuous after both the petitioners and the State agreed that the original order had already been fully complied with by the respondents. Since the subject matter of the contempt complaints had been resolved through compliance, the court found no surviving issue requiring adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts