MUNNI DEVI vs DILIP JAWALKAR — CLCON/163/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: --DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010056122026

Filing Number

CLCON/2973/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CLCON/163/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNNI DEVI

    Adv. ASHISH JOSHI,SHOBHIT JOSHI,SHOBHIT JOSHI, ,SHOBHIT JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILIP JAWALKAR

  2. 2.SHRI YUGAL KISHOR PANT

  3. 3.SHRI SHUBASH CHANDRA

  4. 4.SMT AMITA JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    Summary: The court dismissed nine contempt of court petitions (CLCON Nos. 160, 162-169 of 2026) as infructuous. Both the petitioners' counsel and the State counsel agreed that the original order had already been fully complied with by the respondents, rendering the contempt petitions moot and without purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/163/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed nine contempt of court petitions (CLCON Nos. 160, 162-169 of 2026) as infructuous. Both the petitioners' counsel and the State counsel agreed that the original order had already been fully complied with by the respondents, rendering the contempt petitions moot and without purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case