VISHAL SINGH vs SUSHMA — WPMS/902/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010056082026

Filing Number

WPMS/2970/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPMS/902/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF MISC MATTER ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL SINGH

    Adv. BHUPESH KANDPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHMA

  2. 2.SHRI RAVINDER KUMAR

  3. 3.SMT RAJJU DEVI

  4. 4.AMAR SINGH

  5. 5.DABRAL SINGH

  6. 6.NETAN

  7. 7.CHETAN

  8. 8.DEEPAK

  9. 9.KULDEEP

  10. 10.SHRI KARAMBEER SINGH

  11. 11.SMT KAMLA CHAUDHARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court directed the Assistant Collector (SDO), Dehradun to expedite and decide Suit No.09 of 2011-12 (Sushma vs. Ravindra Kumar and Others) within six months from the certified copy's production date, noting the case had been pending since July 2011. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the case's merits and disposed of the writ petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/902/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court directed the Assistant Collector (SDO), Dehradun to expedite and decide Suit No.09 of 2011-12 (Sushma vs. Ravindra Kumar and Others) within six months from the certified copy's production date, noting the case had been pending since July 2011. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the case's merits and disposed of the writ petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case