ANOOP SINGH SAINI vs RAJENDRA SAINI — WPMS/903/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010055892026

Filing Number

WPMS/2965/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPMS/903/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANOOP SINGH SAINI

    Adv. ABHIJAY NEGI,SNIGDHA TIWARI,SNIGDHA TIWARI, ,PRIYANSH MITTAL,SNIGDHA TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA SAINI

  2. 2.RAMAN SAINI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition and directed the trial court to decide the petitioner's temporary injunction application on 16.04.2026 or expeditiously thereafter, but no later than four weeks from receiving the court's certified order. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the case's merits and did not grant the broader relief sought regarding property alienation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/903/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition and directed the trial court to decide the petitioner's temporary injunction application on 16.04.2026 or expeditiously thereafter, but no later than four weeks from receiving the court's certified order. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the case's merits and did not grant the broader relief sought regarding property alienation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case