STATE OF UTTARAKHAND vs METHODIST CHURCH IN INDIA Advocate - PIYUSH GARG — FA/68/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 96. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010055892025
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
FA/2777/2025
Filing Date
24-04-2025
Registration No
FA/68/2025
Registration Date
24-04-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
UNDER SECTION 96 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Adv. C.S.C.
Respondent(s)
METHODIST CHURCH IN INDIA Advocate - PIYUSH GARG
OSMOND CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL
KENNETH JONES SAMUEL
Adv. VIVEK PATHAK,RACHIT TIWARI ARVIND VASHISHTA PIYUSH GARG
TONY SAMUEL
Adv. SIDDARTHA SAH
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250
Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250
Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250
Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 30-06-2026 | Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250 |
| 10-11-2025 | Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250 |
| 08-10-2025 | Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250 |
| 06-10-2025 | Order on Applications (Time Barred Cases) -250 |
Orders
Case Summary: FA 68/2025 State of Uttarakhand v. Methodist Church in India The case was adjourned to 30.6.2026. The court issued directions for: (1) respondent no. 4 to engage substitute counsel within 48 hours due to prior counsel's elevation to bench, and (2) fresh notice to be served on respondent no. 1 within one week as service had not been effected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: FA 68/2025 State of Uttarakhand v. Methodist Church in India The case was adjourned to 30.6.2026. The court issued directions for: (1) respondent no. 4 to engage substitute counsel within 48 hours due to prior counsel's elevation to bench, and (2) fresh notice to be served on respondent no. 1 within one week as service had not been effected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts