RAGUVEER SINGH NEGI vs GANGA SINGH — CLR/41/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 115. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010055662026

Filing Number

CLR/2954/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CLR/41/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISIONS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION 115 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAGUVEER SINGH NEGI

    Adv. AKSHAY PRADHAN

  2. 2.VINOD PRASAD KAKATWAAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GANGA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    The court dismissed the civil revision petition as withdrawn, permitting the revisionist to withdraw with liberty to file a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The respondent's counsel cited applicable High Court precedent establishing the correct legal position, which the revisionist's counsel accepted by seeking withdrawal rather than continuing the revision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLR/41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the civil revision petition as withdrawn, permitting the revisionist to withdraw with liberty to file a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The respondent's counsel cited applicable High Court precedent establishing the correct legal position, which the revisionist's counsel accepted by seeking withdrawal rather than continuing the revision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case