MS RAM CHANDER SINGH BISHT AND SONS PVT LTD vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEPUTY S.G. — WPMS/893/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010055542026

Filing Number

WPMS/2942/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPMS/893/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS RAM CHANDER SINGH BISHT AND SONS PVT LTD

    Adv. SURYAKANT MAITHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - DEPUTY S.G.

  2. 2.SECRETARY DEPARTMENT FOR PROMOTION

    Adv. DEPUTY S.G.

  3. 3.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.THE DIRECTOR INDUSTRIES

    Adv. C.S.C.

  5. 5.UREDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the writ petition challenging communications restricting Industrial Development Scheme 2017 benefits to registered units only. The court, relying on precedent from the High Court of Himachal Pradesh and its own earlier order, directed an Empowered Committee chaired by the D.I.P.P. Secretary to individually examine the petitioner's case for scheme incentives within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/893/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the writ petition challenging communications restricting Industrial Development Scheme 2017 benefits to registered units only. The court, relying on precedent from the High Court of Himachal Pradesh and its own earlier order, directed an Empowered Committee chaired by the D.I.P.P. Secretary to individually examine the petitioner's case for scheme incentives within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case