S S CONSTRUCTION vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMB/248/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010055212026

Filing Number

WPMB/2922/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPMB/248/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

WRIT PETITION RELATING TO CONTRACT/TENDER MATTER ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S S CONSTRUCTION

    Adv. VIKAS PANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.BIRENDRA SINGH BISHT

  5. 5.RAMESH KUMAR JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed S S Construction's writ petition challenging rejection of its technical bid dated 21.03.2026. The petitioner had submitted experience from water supply work when the tender required information on electrical works completion, but the tender document was not on record. Finding insufficient material to determine if the rejection was unjust or arbitrary, the court dismissed the petition with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMB/248/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed S S Construction's writ petition challenging rejection of its technical bid dated 21.03.2026. The petitioner had submitted experience from water supply work when the tender required information on electrical works completion, but the tender document was not on record. Finding insufficient material to determine if the rejection was unjust or arbitrary, the court dismissed the petition with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case