RAJENDRA SINGH NEGI ALIAS RAJU vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/553/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),352. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010054752026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/2571/2026

Filing Date

07-04-2026

Registration No

BA1/553/2026

Registration Date

07-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),352
Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 30

Petitioner(s)

RAJENDRA SINGH NEGI ALIAS RAJU

Adv. RAJNI SUPYAL/LATWAL,DEVESH UPRETI,DEVESH UPRETI, ,DEVESH UPRETI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

09-04-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

30-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

08-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Case Summary The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of Rajendra Singh Negi, accused of firing a gun at three people causing pellet injuries, under Sections 109(1) and 352 of BNS and Section 30 of the Arms Act. The court found that despite the applicant's claims of false implication and clean criminal record, the state's evidence of previous criminal history and the heinous nature of the offense warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of Rajendra Singh Negi, accused of firing a gun at three people causing pellet injuries, under Sections 109(1) and 352 of BNS and Section 30 of the Arms Act. The court found that despite the applicant's claims of false implication and clean criminal record, the state's evidence of previous criminal history and the heinous nature of the offense warranted denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case