RAKESH MITTAL vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CBI Advocate - PIYUSH GARG — CRLR/211/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 397/401. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010054052025

Filing Number

CRLR/2743/2025

Filing Date

22-Apr-2025

Registration No

CRLR/211/2025

Registration Date

22-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISIONS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

U/S 401 CODE OF CR.P.C.{CASES IN WHICH NOTICE TO ENHANCE SENTENCE/CONVICTION ISSUED(DB)} ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 397/401

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH MITTAL

    Adv. RAVEENDRA SINGH BISHT,AMBRISH KUMAR,AMBRISH KUMAR, ,RAJENDRA SINGH AZAD,AMBRISH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CBI Advocate - PIYUSH GARG

  2. 2.MR. ALOK BIHARI LAL

    Adv. DR.AMAN RAB,MRS.PAYAL BHATIA

  3. 3.MR. G.C. PANT

    Adv. Mamta Bisht,CHAITANYA

  4. 4.MS. PREM DUTT RATURI

    Adv. BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLR 211/2025 Decision: The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Rakesh Mittal's criminal revision petition, upholding the trial court's rejection of his application to summon Alok Bihari Lal and Ganesh Chand Pant as accused in a 2001 police recruitment examination case involving mark discrepancies. Reasoning: The court found insufficient prima facie evidence to summon the respondents under Section 319 CrPC. Witness statements established that respondents 2 and 3 were authorized and directed by senior officials to participate in the recruitment process. The court rejected Mittal's conspiracy allegation (that respondents conspired to implicate him so respondent 2 could become D.G.P.), noting multiple officers senior to respondent 2 made his elevation impossible regardless of Mittal's conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  12. 04-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  13. 04-Sep-2025

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  14. 03-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  15. 03-Sep-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  16. 07-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  17. 07-Aug-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  18. 17-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  20. 25-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  21. 17-Jun-2025

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma

  22. 23-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Bharti SharmaView PDF

  23. 23-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 22-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/211/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLR 211/2025 Decision: The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Rakesh Mittal's criminal revision petition, upholding the trial court's rejection of his application to summon Alok Bihari Lal and Ganesh Chand Pant as accused in a 2001 police recruitment examination case involving mark discrepancies. Reasoning: The court found insufficient prima facie evidence to summon the respondents under Section 319 CrPC. Witness statements established that respondents 2 and 3 were authorized and directed by senior officials to participate in the recruitment process. The court rejected Mittal's conspiracy allegation (that respondents conspired to implicate him so respondent 2 could become D.G.P.), noting multiple officers senior to respondent 2 made his elevation impossible regardless of Mittal's conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case