SHYAM SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/194/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 120B. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010053552023
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLA/2992/2023
Filing Date
10-04-2023
Registration No
CRLA/194/2023
Registration Date
10-04-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHYAM SINGH
Adv. MUKUL DANGI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22
ORDER MATTERS -17
ORDER MATTERS -17
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2023 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 07-05-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 18-02-2026 | ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22 |
| 15-10-2024 | ORDER MATTERS -17 |
| 14-06-2024 | ORDER MATTERS -17 |
Orders
Summary of CRLA 194/2023 Shyam Singh's second bail application was rejected. The appellant, convicted under IPC Sections 363, 323 and POCSO Act Sections 5/6 with a 25-year sentence, had been incarcerated since 2019. The court found no new grounds presented beyond long incarceration and noted the appellant had completed less than 50% of his sentence. Given victim's statement of repeated sexual assault and supporting DNA evidence, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRLA 194/2023 Shyam Singh's second bail application was rejected. The appellant, convicted under IPC Sections 363, 323 and POCSO Act Sections 5/6 with a 25-year sentence, had been incarcerated since 2019. The court found no new grounds presented beyond long incarceration and noted the appellant had completed less than 50% of his sentence. Given victim's statement of repeated sexual assault and supporting DNA evidence, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts