GOPAL SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/860/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010053502026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMS/2837/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

WPMS/860/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF REVENUE COURT IN OTHER REVENUE CASES ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

GOPAL SINGH

Adv. BHUPENDRA SINGH BHANDARI

KESHAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

COMMISSIONER KUMAUN DIVISION

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

10-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

10-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand directed the Commissioner, Kumaon Division, District Nainital to expedite the hearing and decide Revision No. 15 of 2026 ("Gopal Singh and Another vs. State of Uttarakhand") as expeditiously as possible without granting unnecessary adjournments. The court disposed of the writ petition with this direction, expressly noting it expressed no opinion on the merits of the underlying case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand directed the Commissioner, Kumaon Division, District Nainital to expedite the hearing and decide Revision No. 15 of 2026 ("Gopal Singh and Another vs. State of Uttarakhand") as expeditiously as possible without granting unnecessary adjournments. The court disposed of the writ petition with this direction, expressly noting it expressed no opinion on the merits of the underlying case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case