GOPAL SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/860/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010053502026

Filing Number

WPMS/2837/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPMS/860/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF REVENUE COURT IN OTHER REVENUE CASES ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL SINGH

    Adv. BHUPENDRA SINGH BHANDARI

  2. 2.KESHAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.COMMISSIONER KUMAUN DIVISION

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand directed the Commissioner, Kumaon Division, District Nainital to expedite the hearing and decide Revision No. 15 of 2026 ("Gopal Singh and Another vs. State of Uttarakhand") as expeditiously as possible without granting unnecessary adjournments. The court disposed of the writ petition with this direction, expressly noting it expressed no opinion on the merits of the underlying case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/860/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand directed the Commissioner, Kumaon Division, District Nainital to expedite the hearing and decide Revision No. 15 of 2026 ("Gopal Singh and Another vs. State of Uttarakhand") as expeditiously as possible without granting unnecessary adjournments. The court disposed of the writ petition with this direction, expressly noting it expressed no opinion on the merits of the underlying case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case