VIKAS KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/975/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010053322026

Filing Number

WPSS/2829/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPSS/975/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

TERMINATION/DISMISSAL ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS KUMAR

    Adv. SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL,Tilak Ram Sharma,Tilak Ram Sharma, ,Tilak Ram Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.STATE INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SIDCUL

    Adv. VIPUL SHARMA

  3. 3.GENERAL MANAGER SIDCUL

    Adv. VIPUL SHARMA

  4. 4.COMPANY SECRETARY SIDCUL

    Adv. VIPUL SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Chairman of SIIDCUL to decide the petitioner's appeal against his dismissal within eight weeks from the date of receiving the certified copy of the order. The petitioner, a driver dismissed on 12.10.2023, had filed an appeal on 11.06.2024 that remained pending, and the court intervened to ensure timely resolution as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/975/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Chairman of SIIDCUL to decide the petitioner's appeal against his dismissal within eight weeks from the date of receiving the certified copy of the order. The petitioner, a driver dismissed on 12.10.2023, had filed an appeal on 11.06.2024 that remained pending, and the court intervened to ensure timely resolution as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case