NITIN JAIN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS/836/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010051972026
Filing Number
WPMS/2773/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPMS/836/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NITIN JAIN
Adv. PRASHANT SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.REGISTRAR SOCIETIES FIRMS AND CHITS
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DEPUTY REGISTRAR SOCIETIES FIRMS AND CHITS
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed a writ petition filed by the Vice President of Scholars Educational and Welfare Society seeking mandamus to compel the Deputy Registrar to decide pending representations regarding alleged illegal changes to the society's office bearers and bylaws. The court found the petition premature and lacking a valid cause of action, as the petitioner's claims were based on mere rumors without concrete evidence of actual changes to the society's composition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/836/2026
The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed a writ petition filed by the Vice President of Scholars Educational and Welfare Society seeking mandamus to compel the Deputy Registrar to decide pending representations regarding alleged illegal changes to the society's office bearers and bylaws. The court found the petition premature and lacking a valid cause of action, as the petitioner's claims were based on mere rumors without concrete evidence of actual changes to the society's composition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts