RAJESH BALMIKI DIGVIJAY SINGH BISHT(LEGAL AID) vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/509/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 302,376,201. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010051232026

Filing Number

BA1/2399/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

BA1/509/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 302,376,201

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH BALMIKI DIGVIJAY SINGH BISHT(LEGAL AID)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Case Summary: BA1/509/2026 In this bail application hearing dated 19.05.2026, Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani heard arguments from Digvijay Singh Bisht (legal aid counsel for petitioner Rajesh Balmiki) and Vipul Painuly (AGA for State of Uttarakhand). The court adjourned the matter, directing that it be relisted after the Registry's pointed defects are remedied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Order Matters -17

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/509/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/509/2026 In this bail application hearing dated 19.05.2026, Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani heard arguments from Digvijay Singh Bisht (legal aid counsel for petitioner Rajesh Balmiki) and Vipul Painuly (AGA for State of Uttarakhand). The court adjourned the matter, directing that it be relisted after the Registry's pointed defects are remedied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case