RAHUL KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/508/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21/29/60. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 19th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010051222026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/2398/2026

Filing Date

01-04-2026

Registration No

BA1/508/2026

Registration Date

01-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/21/29/60

Petitioner(s)

RAHUL KUMAR

Adv. AMIT TYAGI,GAURAV NAGPAL,GAURAV NAGPAL, ,GAURAV NAGPAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

06-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

19-05-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

22-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

19-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

In BA1/508/2026, Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani dismissed Rahul Kumar's bail application as infructuous on 19.05.2026. The applicant's counsel stated before the court that the bail application had become infructuous and sought its dismissal, which the court granted without adjudicating the merits of the bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In BA1/508/2026, Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani dismissed Rahul Kumar's bail application as infructuous on 19.05.2026. The applicant's counsel stated before the court that the bail application had become infructuous and sought its dismissal, which the court granted without adjudicating the merits of the bail plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case