ABHISHEK NEGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/506/2026

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 5J(II)/6. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010050932026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/2385/2026

Filing Date

01-04-2026

Registration No

BA1/506/2026

Registration Date

01-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 5J(II)/6
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(1)

Petitioner(s)

ABHISHEK NEGI

Adv. VIKAS BAHUGUNA,YASH BISHT,YASH BISHT, ,YASH BISHT

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

06-04-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

29-04-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

24-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

08-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

BA1/506/2026 - Abhishek Negi v. State of Uttarakhand The court rejected Abhishek Negi's bail application in a child sexual abuse case involving allegations of repeated sexual assault resulting in pregnancy. The court found the charges grave and serious, involving a minor victim, with no mitigating circumstances warranting bail, despite the applicant's arguments of consensuality and contradictions in victim statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

BA1/506/2026 - Abhishek Negi v. State of Uttarakhand The court rejected Abhishek Negi's bail application in a child sexual abuse case involving allegations of repeated sexual assault resulting in pregnancy. The court found the charges grave and serious, involving a minor victim, with no mitigating circumstances warranting bail, despite the applicant's arguments of consensuality and contradictions in victim statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case