ABHISHEK NEGI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/506/2026
Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 5J(II)/6. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010050932026
Filing Number
BA1/2385/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
BA1/506/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK NEGI
Adv. VIKAS BAHUGUNA,YASH BISHT,YASH BISHT, ,YASH BISHT
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
BA1/506/2026 - Abhishek Negi v. State of Uttarakhand The court rejected Abhishek Negi's bail application in a child sexual abuse case involving allegations of repeated sexual assault resulting in pregnancy. The court found the charges grave and serious, involving a minor victim, with no mitigating circumstances warranting bail, despite the applicant's arguments of consensuality and contradictions in victim statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
08-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/506/2026
BA1/506/2026 - Abhishek Negi v. State of Uttarakhand The court rejected Abhishek Negi's bail application in a child sexual abuse case involving allegations of repeated sexual assault resulting in pregnancy. The court found the charges grave and serious, involving a minor victim, with no mitigating circumstances warranting bail, despite the applicant's arguments of consensuality and contradictions in victim statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts