AYUSH THAKUR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/500/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20/60. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010050652026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/2368/2026

Filing Date

01-04-2026

Registration No

BA1/500/2026

Registration Date

01-04-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20/60

Petitioner(s)

AYUSH THAKUR

Adv. RAJAT MITTAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

06-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

19-05-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

22-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

19-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Case BA1/500/2026 Summary: Court granted bail to Ayush Thakur, arrested for alleged narcotic drug possession under NDPS Act sections 8/20/60. Judge Ashish Naithani found merit in the applicant's allegations of procedural irregularities—specifically that arrest memo and inventory report pre-contained the FIR number, raising prosecution credibility issues. Despite state opposition citing large contraband quantity, the court released the applicant on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case BA1/500/2026 Summary: Court granted bail to Ayush Thakur, arrested for alleged narcotic drug possession under NDPS Act sections 8/20/60. Judge Ashish Naithani found merit in the applicant's allegations of procedural irregularities—specifically that arrest memo and inventory report pre-contained the FIR number, raising prosecution credibility issues. Despite state opposition citing large contraband quantity, the court released the applicant on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case