Commissioner of Income Tax HARI MOHAN BHATIA vs Weatherford Oil Tools M E Limited Advocate - PULAK RAJ MULLICK — ITA/12/2026

Case under Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act No. 43 of 1961) Section 260A. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010049312026

e-Filing Number

26-03-2026

Filing Number

ITA/2632/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

ITA/12/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

INCOME TAX APPEAL ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act No. 43 of 1961) Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Commissioner of Income Tax HARI MOHAN BHATIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Weatherford Oil Tools M E Limited Advocate - PULAK RAJ MULLICK

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: ITA/12/2026 The Income Tax Appeal was admitted by the High Court on 08.05.2026. The Commissioner of Income Tax challenges whether the ITAT erred in allowing the assessee's appeal by overlooking amended provisions of Sections 19(1)(i), 9(1)(vii), 44AB, and 44DA of the Income Tax Act. The respondent's counsel accepted notice and was granted six weeks to file appearance and counter-affidavit. The case was adjourned for listing after six weeks along with related ITAs 04/2026 and 22/2025 involving identical legal questions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ITA/12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ITA/12/2026 The Income Tax Appeal was admitted by the High Court on 08.05.2026. The Commissioner of Income Tax challenges whether the ITAT erred in allowing the assessee's appeal by overlooking amended provisions of Sections 19(1)(i), 9(1)(vii), 44AB, and 44DA of the Income Tax Act. The respondent's counsel accepted notice and was granted six weeks to file appearance and counter-affidavit. The case was adjourned for listing after six weeks along with related ITAs 04/2026 and 22/2025 involving identical legal questions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case