Commissioner of Income Tax HARI MOHAN BHATIA vs Weatherford Oil Tools M E Limited Advocate - PULAK RAJ MULLICK — ITA/15/2026

Case under Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act No. 43 of 1961) Section 260A. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010049302026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

26-03-2026

Filing Number

ITA/2631/2026

Filing Date

27-03-2026

Registration No

ITA/15/2026

Registration Date

27-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

INCOME TAX APPEAL ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act No. 43 of 1961) Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

Commissioner of Income Tax HARI MOHAN BHATIA

Respondent(s)

Weatherford Oil Tools M E Limited Advocate - PULAK RAJ MULLICK

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

01-04-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

08-05-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Case Summary: ITA/15/2026 The Income Tax Appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law concerning whether the ITAT erred in allowing the assessee's appeal while overlooking amended provisions of Sections 19(1)(i), 9(1)(vii), 44AB, and 44DA of the Income Tax Act. The court listed the case for hearing after four weeks jointly with ITA No. 04 of 2026 and ITA No. 22 of 2025, which involve identical legal questions. The respondent was directed to file appearance and counter-affidavit within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ITA/15/2026 The Income Tax Appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law concerning whether the ITAT erred in allowing the assessee's appeal while overlooking amended provisions of Sections 19(1)(i), 9(1)(vii), 44AB, and 44DA of the Income Tax Act. The court listed the case for hearing after four weeks jointly with ITA No. 04 of 2026 and ITA No. 22 of 2025, which involve identical legal questions. The respondent was directed to file appearance and counter-affidavit within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act No. 43 of 1961) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case