Commissioner of Income Tax HARI MOHAN BHATIA vs Weatherford Oil Tools M E Limited Advocate - PULAK RAJ MULLICK — ITA/11/2026

Case under Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act No. 43 of 1961) Section 260A. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010049292026

e-Filing Number

26-03-2026

Filing Number

ITA/2630/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

ITA/11/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

INCOME TAX APPEAL ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act No. 43 of 1961) Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Commissioner of Income Tax HARI MOHAN BHATIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Weatherford Oil Tools M E Limited Advocate - PULAK RAJ MULLICK

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    Summary: In ITA/11/2026, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing Weatherford Oil Tools M E Limited's appeal was challenged by the Commissioner of Income Tax on the question of law regarding alleged overlooking of amended provisions under Sections 19(1)(i), 9(1)(vii), 44AB, and 44DA of the Income Tax Act. The court admitted the appeal and adjourned the case for six weeks, to be listed together with related ITAs (ITA No. 04 of 2026 and ITA No. 22 of 2025) involving identical legal questions. The respondent was granted six weeks to file its counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ITA/11/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In ITA/11/2026, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing Weatherford Oil Tools M E Limited's appeal was challenged by the Commissioner of Income Tax on the question of law regarding alleged overlooking of amended provisions under Sections 19(1)(i), 9(1)(vii), 44AB, and 44DA of the Income Tax Act. The court admitted the appeal and adjourned the case for six weeks, to be listed together with related ITAs (ITA No. 04 of 2026 and ITA No. 22 of 2025) involving identical legal questions. The respondent was granted six weeks to file its counter-affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case