LAMACHAUR SHRAM SANVIDA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD vs REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES — SPA/88/2026

Case under Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section VIII. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010048882026

Filing Number

SPA/2596/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

SPA/88/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Rule 5, Chapter Viii of the High Court Rule Section VIII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAMACHAUR SHRAM SANVIDA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD

    Adv. VINAY BHATT,MOHD SHAFY,MOHD SHAFY, ,MOHD SHAFY

  2. 2.DHAULAKHEDA MATSYA JEEVI UTPADAN SAHKARI SAMITI LTD

  3. 3.KOSHYA KUTAULI KIRSHI UTPADAN EVAM VIPDAN SAHKARI SAMITI LTD

  4. 4.VAIBHAV RASAYAN EVAM VIPADAN SAHKARI SAMITI LTD

  5. 5.GRAM VIKAS SHRAM NIRMAN SAHKARI SAMITI LTD

  6. 6.GAULA SAHKARI SHRAM SANVIDA SAMITI LTD

  7. 7.NAINITAL ZILA RESHAM SEHKARI SANGH LTD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES

  2. 2.DEPUTY REGISTRAR

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DISTRICT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.UTTARAKHAND COOPERATIVE ELECTION TRIBUNAL

    Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the special appeal against a Single Judge's order that had dismissed a writ petition challenging a Rule 291 show cause notice issued under the Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, 2004. The court held that writ petitions against show cause notices are normally not maintainable unless the issuing authority lacks competence, and since the appellants had an opportunity to respond before the competent authority with no final order yet passed, the Single Judge's dismissal was correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

  9. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  10. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

  11. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SPA/88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the special appeal against a Single Judge's order that had dismissed a writ petition challenging a Rule 291 show cause notice issued under the Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, 2004. The court held that writ petitions against show cause notices are normally not maintainable unless the issuing authority lacks competence, and since the appellants had an opportunity to respond before the competent authority with no final order yet passed, the Single Judge's dismissal was correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case