SURENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND ANR vs R RAJESH Advocate - C.S.C. — CLCON/148/2025

Case under Contempt of Court's Act,1971 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 27th April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010047972025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CLCON/2355/2025

Filing Date

07-04-2025

Registration No

CLCON/148/2025

Registration Date

07-04-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court's Act,1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

SURENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND ANR

Adv. AMAR MURTI SHUKLA,LATA NEGI,LATA NEGI, ANAND SINGH,LATA NEGI

Respondent(s)

R RAJESH Advocate - C.S.C.

DR. ASHUTOSH SAYANA

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

08-04-2025

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

27-04-2026

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

10-04-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

10-04-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

06-11-2025

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

Orders

27-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand found no contempt, as the Competent Authority had complied with the October 2024 court order by constituting a selection committee under the Regularisation Rules, 2013, which subsequently rejected the petitioners' regularisation claim. The petitioners chose not to pursue the contempt petition further, so the court closed the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand found no contempt, as the Competent Authority had complied with the October 2024 court order by constituting a selection committee under the Regularisation Rules, 2013, which subsequently rejected the petitioners' regularisation claim. The petitioners chose not to pursue the contempt petition further, so the court closed the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case