MS ASTITVA ANANTRAJ ENTERPRISES vs BRIJESH KUMAR SANT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — CLCON/120/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010047382026
Filing Number
CLCON/2526/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
CLCON/120/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MS ASTITVA ANANTRAJ ENTERPRISES
Adv. GIRVEER CHAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.BRIJESH KUMAR SANT PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
The court dismissed the contempt petition (CLCON No. 120 of 2026) filed against M/s Astitva Anantraj Enterprises for alleged wilful disobedience of a February 19, 2026 order, as the petitioner's counsel confirmed compliance with the original order and stated the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the matter. Justice Alok Kumar Verma accordingly closed the proceedings without further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CLCON/120/2026
The court dismissed the contempt petition (CLCON No. 120 of 2026) filed against M/s Astitva Anantraj Enterprises for alleged wilful disobedience of a February 19, 2026 order, as the petitioner's counsel confirmed compliance with the original order and stated the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the matter. Justice Alok Kumar Verma accordingly closed the proceedings without further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts