Devendra Singh SURENDRA KUMAR POSTI, ,ASHUTOSH POSTI vs ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, — SA/98/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

CNR: UKHC010047312017

Next Hearing

03rd July 2026

Filing Number

SA/1010416/2017

Filing Date

02-08-2017

Registration No

SA/98/2017

Registration Date

02-08-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

Devendra Singh SURENDRA KUMAR POSTI, ,ASHUTOSH POSTI

BISHAN SINGH

Adv. SURENDRA KUMAR POSTI,ASHUTOSH POSTI

Respondent(s)

ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA,

Adv. ,SIDDHARTHA SINGH,DEPUTY S.G. 1123

SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CULTURAL AND TOURSIM

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

03-07-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

12-09-2018

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

09-08-2017

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

04-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Case Summary: SA/98/2017 The second appeal was admitted by Hon'ble Justice Siddhartha Sah on two substantial questions of law: (1) whether the first appellate court correctly applied Section 20(O) of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 in declaring the suit non-tenable; and (2) whether defendants illegally encroached on the plaintiff's 13 mutthi land (Khet No.3577) and whether lower courts erred in dismissing the suit. The case was adjourned and listed for 03.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA/98/2017 The second appeal was admitted by Hon'ble Justice Siddhartha Sah on two substantial questions of law: (1) whether the first appellate court correctly applied Section 20(O) of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 in declaring the suit non-tenable; and (2) whether defendants illegally encroached on the plaintiff's 13 mutthi land (Khet No.3577) and whether lower courts erred in dismissing the suit. The case was adjourned and listed for 03.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case