PADAM SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/888/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jul-2026

CNR: UKHC010045962026

Filing Number

WPSS/2446/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPSS/888/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PADAM SINGH

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR JOSHI

  2. 2.BOHTI DEVI

  3. 3.REKHA SAJWAN PAYAL

  4. 4.KAMAL SINGH CHAUHAN

  5. 5.SANJAY PAYAL

  6. 6.ASHAK KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jul-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    Summary of WPSS 888/2026 The Court rejected the State's submission that a 2018 precedent judgment should not be treated as binding precedent, finding such instructions "preposterous." The case was adjourned; the State was directed to file a counter affidavit within four weeks, with next hearing on 22.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/888/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPSS 888/2026 The Court rejected the State's submission that a 2018 precedent judgment should not be treated as binding precedent, finding such instructions "preposterous." The case was adjourned; the State was directed to file a counter affidavit within four weeks, with next hearing on 22.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case