TAYYABA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS /726/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010045862026

Next Hearing

26th May 2026

Filing Number

WPMS /2438/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

WPMS /726/2026

Registration Date

23-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

TAYYABA

Adv. HIMANSHU PAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT ENGINEER

Adv. C.S.C.

PROJECT DIRECTOR

MUNTAZIR

Adv. VIVEK SHUKLA (FOR CAVEATOR),BHUWNESH JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

25-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

26-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

CASE SUMMARY (WPMS No. 726 of 2026) The High Court of Uttarakhand found the proceedings against petitioner Tayyaba (Gram Pradhan) vitiated due to procedural violation—she was not heard during the initial inquiry based on the complaint of financial irregularities, making subsequent orders by SDM Laksar (02.12.2025) and CDO Haridwar (10.03.2026) declaring her ineligible invalid. The Court stayed both impugned orders, issued notice to respondent No.8, and scheduled the case for further hearing on 26.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY (WPMS No. 726 of 2026) The High Court of Uttarakhand found the proceedings against petitioner Tayyaba (Gram Pradhan) vitiated due to procedural violation—she was not heard during the initial inquiry based on the complaint of financial irregularities, making subsequent orders by SDM Laksar (02.12.2025) and CDO Haridwar (10.03.2026) declaring her ineligible invalid. The Court stayed both impugned orders, issued notice to respondent No.8, and scheduled the case for further hearing on 26.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case