TAYYABA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/726/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010045862026
Filing Number
WPMS/2438/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPMS/726/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TAYYABA
Adv. HIMANSHU PAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
7.DISTRICT ENGINEER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
8.PROJECT DIRECTOR
-
9.MUNTAZIR
Adv. VIVEK SHUKLA (FOR CAVEATOR),BHUWNESH JOSHI
Case History
-
26-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
CASE SUMMARY (WPMS No. 726 of 2026) The High Court of Uttarakhand found the proceedings against petitioner Tayyaba (Gram Pradhan) vitiated due to procedural violation—she was not heard during the initial inquiry based on the complaint of financial irregularities, making subsequent orders by SDM Laksar (02.12.2025) and CDO Haridwar (10.03.2026) declaring her ineligible invalid. The Court stayed both impugned orders, issued notice to respondent No.8, and scheduled the case for further hearing on 26.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/726/2026
CASE SUMMARY (WPMS No. 726 of 2026) The High Court of Uttarakhand found the proceedings against petitioner Tayyaba (Gram Pradhan) vitiated due to procedural violation—she was not heard during the initial inquiry based on the complaint of financial irregularities, making subsequent orders by SDM Laksar (02.12.2025) and CDO Haridwar (10.03.2026) declaring her ineligible invalid. The Court stayed both impugned orders, issued notice to respondent No.8, and scheduled the case for further hearing on 26.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts