NASEEMA BANO vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL /536/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010045792026
Filing Number
WPCRL /2144/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Registration No
WPCRL /536/2026
Registration Date
23-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL WRIT FOR PROTECTION ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NASEEMA BANO
Adv. SHARIQ KHURSHID
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Adv. G.A.
S.H.O
Adv. G.A.
SAMSHAD MOHAMMAD
ABDUL SALAM
MOHAMMAD RAFEEQ
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary The court disposed of the writ petition by directing both petitioners to appear before the concerned Station House Officer (SHO) for threat assessment. The judge held that if the SHO finds credible threat perception from the respondents (the petitioners' relatives), appropriate steps would be taken to protect the petitioners' life and liberty, rather than issuing direct mandamus for security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court disposed of the writ petition by directing both petitioners to appear before the concerned Station House Officer (SHO) for threat assessment. The judge held that if the SHO finds credible threat perception from the respondents (the petitioners' relatives), appropriate steps would be taken to protect the petitioners' life and liberty, rather than issuing direct mandamus for security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts