CHANDRAMANI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS /886/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010045752026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS /2432/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

WPSS /886/2026

Registration Date

23-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RETIREMENT BENIFITS ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

CHANDRAMANI

Adv. MAHENDRA SINGH RAWAT,ABHISHEK SINGH RAWAT,ABHISHEK SINGH RAWAT, ,ABHISHEK SINGH RAWAT

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

UTTARAKHAND PAYJAL SANSADHAN VIKAS EVEM NIGAM

Adv. S S CHAUHAH

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

25-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

The court directed Uttarakhand Pejal Nigam to release the petitioner's sanctioned retiral dues totaling approximately Rs. 19,54,269 (comprising gratuity of Rs. 12,16,809 and leave encashment of Rs. 7,37,460). The court ordered gratuity payment within two months and leave encashment plus other outstanding dues within four months from the date of certified copy presentation, accepting the respondent's admission that the petitioner was entitled to these amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court directed Uttarakhand Pejal Nigam to release the petitioner's sanctioned retiral dues totaling approximately Rs. 19,54,269 (comprising gratuity of Rs. 12,16,809 and leave encashment of Rs. 7,37,460). The court ordered gratuity payment within two months and leave encashment plus other outstanding dues within four months from the date of certified copy presentation, accepting the respondent's admission that the petitioner was entitled to these amounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case