PAWAN KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS/885/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jul-2026

CNR: UKHC010045732026

Filing Number

WPSS/2430/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPSS/885/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR JOSHI

  2. 2.ONKAR SINGH

  3. 3.RAKESH KUMAR

  4. 4.MITHILESH KUMAR

  5. 5.SURENDRA SINGH

  6. 6.DESHVEER

  7. 7.DUSYANT KUMAR

  8. 8.SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.DIRECTOR

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jul-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    WPSS No. 885/2026 Summary: The court rejected the State's submission that a prior 2018 judgment should not be treated as precedent, finding such instruction "preposterous" since the original judgment contained no such limitation. The State was directed to file a counter affidavit within four weeks, with the case adjourned to 22.07.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/885/2026

casestatus.in Summary

WPSS No. 885/2026 Summary: The court rejected the State's submission that a prior 2018 judgment should not be treated as precedent, finding such instruction "preposterous" since the original judgment contained no such limitation. The State was directed to file a counter affidavit within four weeks, with the case adjourned to 22.07.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case