ANANDI DEVI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/716/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010044962026

Filing Number

WPMS/2392/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPMS/716/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANANDI DEVI

    Adv. ANIL ANTHWAL,C S RAWAT,C S RAWAT, ,VIVEK KUMAR,RAJNI SUPYAL/LATWAL,C S RAWAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.LAND FRAUD COMMITTEE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE MUSSOORRIEE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE OFFICER

    Adv. BHUWAN BHATT

  5. 5.CHAIRMAN

    Adv. BHUWAN BHATT

  6. 6.MR SUNIL GOYAL

  7. 7.MR VIAJY KARWAL

  8. 8.MOHD SAFI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The court disposed of the writ petition after the Nagarpalika Parishad withdrew the impugned order staying land demarcation proceedings and agreed to conduct an inquiry as sought by petitioner Anandi Devi. The court directed respondents to complete the inquiry and submit the report to the Additional Commissioner within four weeks from the date of certified copy production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/716/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the writ petition after the Nagarpalika Parishad withdrew the impugned order staying land demarcation proceedings and agreed to conduct an inquiry as sought by petitioner Anandi Devi. The court directed respondents to complete the inquiry and submit the report to the Additional Commissioner within four weeks from the date of certified copy production. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case