RAKESH KUMAR vs DISTRICT MAGISTRATE — WPMS /713/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010044802026
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
Filing Number
WPMS /2378/2026
Filing Date
23-03-2026
Registration No
WPMS /713/2026
Registration Date
23-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAKESH KUMAR
Adv. M K RAY,MAHUA RAY,MAHUA RAY, ,TIJIL GANGWAR,PRAMOD KUMAR,HARSH TANEJA,MAHUA RAY
Respondent(s)
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CHOLA MANDALAM INVESTMENT
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 28-04-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 06-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
In WPMS No.713 of 2026, the court granted respondent No.2's counsel one week's time to file his Power of Attorney. The case was adjourned to 28.04.2026 for further proceedings, and the affidavit of service requirement was waived since respondent No.2 appeared through counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In WPMS No.713 of 2026, the court granted respondent No.2's counsel one week's time to file his Power of Attorney. The case was adjourned to 28.04.2026 for further proceedings, and the affidavit of service requirement was waived since respondent No.2 appeared through counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts