SONAM vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS /865/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010044602026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS /2370/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

WPSS /865/2026

Registration Date

23-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SONAM

Adv. ADITYA SINGH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

DIRECTOR GENERAL SCHOOL EDUCATION

Adv. C.S.C.

DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION PRIMARY

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER PRIMARY EDUCATION

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

25-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a Government Order restricting SC reservation benefits for inter-state migrants who acquired caste certificates in Uttarakhand upon marriage. The court found the issue was already decided in WPSS No. 462 of 2025 and applied that judgment's reasoning to this petition, upholding the state's reservation policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a Government Order restricting SC reservation benefits for inter-state migrants who acquired caste certificates in Uttarakhand upon marriage. The court found the issue was already decided in WPSS No. 462 of 2025 and applied that judgment's reasoning to this petition, upholding the state's reservation policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case