SONAM vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/865/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010044602026
Filing Number
WPSS/2370/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPSS/865/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONAM
Adv. ADITYA SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.DIRECTOR GENERAL SCHOOL EDUCATION
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DIRECTOR PRIMARY EDUCATION PRIMARY
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER PRIMARY EDUCATION
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a Government Order restricting SC reservation benefits for inter-state migrants who acquired caste certificates in Uttarakhand upon marriage. The court found the issue was already decided in WPSS No. 462 of 2025 and applied that judgment's reasoning to this petition, upholding the state's reservation policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/865/2026
The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to a Government Order restricting SC reservation benefits for inter-state migrants who acquired caste certificates in Uttarakhand upon marriage. The court found the issue was already decided in WPSS No. 462 of 2025 and applied that judgment's reasoning to this petition, upholding the state's reservation policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts