ROOBAL RAWAT vs DIRECTOR PANCHAYATI RAJ — WPSS /866/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 25th March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010044592026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS /2369/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

WPSS /866/2026

Registration Date

23-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS/ACTION ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

ROOBAL RAWAT

Adv. ADITYA SINGH,Tushar Chauhan,Tushar Chauhan, ,Tushar Chauhan

Respondent(s)

DIRECTOR PANCHAYATI RAJ

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

25-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application in the pending writ petition. The State argued the petition was barred by constructive res judicata since the petitioner should have sought all reliefs in her earlier writ petition challenging the recovery order, and the petitioner's counsel agreed to withdraw and pursue the matter through the appropriate application in the pending petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application in the pending writ petition. The State argued the petition was barred by constructive res judicata since the petitioner should have sought all reliefs in her earlier writ petition challenging the recovery order, and the petitioner's counsel agreed to withdraw and pursue the matter through the appropriate application in the pending petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case