RAVI PAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — ABA/101/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010044242026

Filing Number

ABA/2074/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

ABA/101/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI PAL

    Adv. RAJAT PANDEY,VENKATESH,VENKATESH, ,VENKATESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ravi Pal in FIR No. 349 of 2025 (under BNS Sections 108 and 351(3)) based on parity with a co-accused who received similar bail and the absence of specific allegations against the applicant. The court imposed conditions including a ₹30,000 personal bond with two sureties, cooperation with investigation, non-interference with witnesses, and restriction on leaving the country without trial court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ravi Pal in FIR No. 349 of 2025 (under BNS Sections 108 and 351(3)) based on parity with a co-accused who received similar bail and the absence of specific allegations against the applicant. The court imposed conditions including a ₹30,000 personal bond with two sureties, cooperation with investigation, non-interference with witnesses, and restriction on leaving the country without trial court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case