PARAMJEET SINGH ALIAS DIGAMBAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/437/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010044212026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1/2072/2026

Filing Date

20-03-2026

Registration No

BA1/437/2026

Registration Date

20-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20

Petitioner(s)

PARAMJEET SINGH ALIAS DIGAMBAR

Adv. LALIT SHARMA,SHUBHAM BHARDWAJ,SHUBHAM BHARDWAJ, ,SANGEETA BHARDWAJ,SHUBHAM BHARDWAJ

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

24-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

10-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

07-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Case Summary: BA1/437/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Paramjeet Singh @ Digambar, who was in judicial custody for an NDPS Act offense (Sections 8/20) involving alleged drug possession. The court allowed the bail application after considering that the applicant had no criminal history, alleged procedural violations in evidence recovery (non-compliance with Sections 42, 50, 57 of NDPS Act), lack of independent witnesses, and notably, that the main accused and co-accused had already been granted bail by the same court. The applicant was released on personal bond with two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BA1/437/2026 The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Paramjeet Singh @ Digambar, who was in judicial custody for an NDPS Act offense (Sections 8/20) involving alleged drug possession. The court allowed the bail application after considering that the applicant had no criminal history, alleged procedural violations in evidence recovery (non-compliance with Sections 42, 50, 57 of NDPS Act), lack of independent witnesses, and notably, that the main accused and co-accused had already been granted bail by the same court. The applicant was released on personal bond with two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case