RAHUL VOHRA vs UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL — WPMS /695/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010044112026

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

WPMS /2343/2026

Filing Date

20-03-2026

Registration No

WPMS /695/2026

Registration Date

20-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

RAHUL VOHRA

Adv. PRABHAKAR JOSHI,VINOD CHANDRA TIWARI,VINOD CHANDRA TIWARI, ,VINOD CHANDRA TIWARI

Respondent(s)

UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LIMITED Advocate - DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Adv. DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL

SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

Adv. DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Adv. C.S.C.

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

23-03-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

01-04-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

24-03-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

24-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Case Adjourned. In WPMS No.695 of 2026 (Rahul Vohra v. Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited and others), Hon'ble Justice Pankaj Purohit adjourned the case to 01.04.2026 to be listed along with WPMS No.2619 of 2024. No substantive order on merit was passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned. In WPMS No.695 of 2026 (Rahul Vohra v. Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited and others), Hon'ble Justice Pankaj Purohit adjourned the case to 01.04.2026 to be listed along with WPMS No.2619 of 2024. No substantive order on merit was passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case