BABITA DHYANI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSS /852/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010043942026
Filing Number
WPSS /2329/2026
Filing Date
20-03-2026
Registration No
WPSS /852/2026
Registration Date
20-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
SENIORITY ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BABITA DHYANI
Adv. SS YADAV
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
ADDITIONAL SECRETARY
Adv. C.S.C.
DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
NAGAR SHIKSHA ADHIKARI
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 27-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 25-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The court acknowledged that the petitioner was wrongly transferred from District Pauri to Dehradun within a year of her 2009 appointment, violating district-level cadre rules. However, the court upheld the unified district-level cadre system for Assistant Teachers and rejected the petitioner's demand for separate urban/rural seniority lists, directing authorities to include her name in the appropriate cadre seniority list. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acknowledged that the petitioner was wrongly transferred from District Pauri to Dehradun within a year of her 2009 appointment, violating district-level cadre rules. However, the court upheld the unified district-level cadre system for Assistant Teachers and rejected the petitioner's demand for separate urban/rural seniority lists, directing authorities to include her name in the appropriate cadre seniority list. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts