M/S DEEP AND SONS ENTERPRISES vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER — WPMB /192/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 25th March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010043642026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMB /2312/2026

Filing Date

19-03-2026

Registration No

WPMB /192/2026

Registration Date

19-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

GOODS AND SERVICE TAX ACT ( 48 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

M/S DEEP AND SONS ENTERPRISES

Adv. KAUSHAL PANDEY,Jasmeet Sahota,Jasmeet Sahota, ,Jasmeet Sahota

Respondent(s)

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

20-03-2026

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed M/s Deep and Sons Enterprises' writ petition seeking to quash GST tax notices totaling Rs. 21,62,386.80 (CGST and SGST combined) and a registration cancellation order issued under Section 73 of the Uttarakhand GST Act, 2017. The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue alternative statutory remedies through the appeal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed M/s Deep and Sons Enterprises' writ petition seeking to quash GST tax notices totaling Rs. 21,62,386.80 (CGST and SGST combined) and a registration cancellation order issued under Section 73 of the Uttarakhand GST Act, 2017. The court allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue alternative statutory remedies through the appeal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case