PRIYA JOSHI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPSB/167/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010043622026
Filing Number
WPSB/2310/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPSB/167/2026
Registration Date
19-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRIYA JOSHI
Adv. DIVYA TIWARI,ANIL KUMAR JOSHI,ANIL KUMAR JOSHI, ,ANIL KUMAR JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.SOBAN SINGH JEENA UNIVERSITY ALMORA
Adv. C S RAWAT
-
3.VICE CHANCELLOR
Adv. C S RAWAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF
Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed Priya Joshi's petition seeking extension of her temporary Guest Lecturer position until a permanent Assistant Professor post could be filled. The court found that her appointment was purely temporary and could be terminated without notice under the agreement terms, and upheld the university's decision not to extend her tenure beyond June 2025 due to unsatisfactory performance—she was absent for 96 days out of 180 and failed to provide satisfactory explanation to a show-cause notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSB/167/2026
Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed Priya Joshi's petition seeking extension of her temporary Guest Lecturer position until a permanent Assistant Professor post could be filled. The court found that her appointment was purely temporary and could be terminated without notice under the agreement terms, and upheld the university's decision not to extend her tenure beyond June 2025 due to unsatisfactory performance—she was absent for 96 days out of 180 and failed to provide satisfactory explanation to a show-cause notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts