NASREEN vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/495/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010043592026

Filing Number

WPCRL/2051/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

C528/495/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 138 N.I. ACT ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NASREEN

    Adv. C K SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SUNITA

    Adv. NITIN TEWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the compounding application filed by Nasreen and quashed the criminal proceedings against her under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found sufficient grounds for compounding as both parties had amicably settled their dispute, which arose from a misunderstanding, and sought to restore peace and harmony between them, relying on Supreme Court precedent in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. C528/495/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the compounding application filed by Nasreen and quashed the criminal proceedings against her under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found sufficient grounds for compounding as both parties had amicably settled their dispute, which arose from a misunderstanding, and sought to restore peace and harmony between them, relying on Supreme Court precedent in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case