NARESH GUPTA AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528 /493/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2)126(2),351(3),352,74. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010043372026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

C528 /2038/2026

Filing Date

19-03-2026

Registration No

C528 /493/2026

Registration Date

19-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2)126(2),351(3),352,74

Petitioner(s)

NARESH GUPTA AND ORS

Adv. VIVEK SHUKLA,BHUWNESH JOSHI,BHUWNESH JOSHI, ,MUDITA PRIYADARSHANI SHUKLA,BHUWNESH JOSHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Adv. G.A.

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Adv. G.A.

MEENA DEVI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

23-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

27-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

27-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Case Summary Case No. C-528 No. 493 of 2026 | Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. The court stayed proceedings in Crime Case No. 0112 of 2025 against the applicants under POCSO Act and BNS sections. The applicants challenged the chargesheet alleging false allegations and citing a 23-day delay in FIR filing, along with the complainant being declared hostile in a prior FIR. The court found substance in these submissions and, in the interest of justice, granted a stay of further proceedings pending the next hearing. Notice issued to the respondent, returnable within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No. C-528 No. 493 of 2026 | Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. The court stayed proceedings in Crime Case No. 0112 of 2025 against the applicants under POCSO Act and BNS sections. The applicants challenged the chargesheet alleging false allegations and citing a 23-day delay in FIR filing, along with the complainant being declared hostile in a prior FIR. The court found substance in these submissions and, in the interest of justice, granted a stay of further proceedings pending the next hearing. Notice issued to the respondent, returnable within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case